Last Modified: 8/7/2008 7:58:51 PM
Skip Navigation Links

Trenching

Results

 - Trenching

2004-2005 Antares Trenching Program

 

During 2004-2005, Antares continued the utilization of trenching as a low-cost exploration tool at Rio Grande; cutting a total of 14 new trenches for 3,544 metres and the collection of 1,284 geochemical channel samples (Table 1; Figure 1). The principal objectives of the trenching program were to:

  1. Test several areas with strong Au-Cu soil geochemical anomalies and little or no outcrop exposure,
  2. Test for extensions of previously known mineralized zones (e.g., Discovery Zone),
  3. Establish better controls on the geometry of the mineralized zones, and
  4. Provide geological and structural information in areas of limited or no outcrop.

A Komatsu PC220-6 excavator was used for this work; which was found to be a highly versatile machine in comparison to a traditional backhoe. The excavator was also utilized for road construction, drill pad construction, and assisting in certain movements of drill equipment.

Trench locations were established first using all the available information within the Rio Grande GIS database. In order to avoid confusion in the numbering of the new trenches; the first new trench of the 2004-2005 campaign was designated T-23, with the last Teck trench from 2000-2001 being T-22. All proposed new trench locations were double-checked in the field before they were started; with corrections and/or adjustments in location, length, and depth made according to field conditions.

As a general rule and for safety reasons, all new trenches are no more than 2 metres deep. If bedrock was not encountered in the first 2 metres the trench was stopped. In the rare cases where the bedrock was not encountered within the first 2 metres, a series of shallow pits every 50 metres along the trace of the proposed trench were dug in attempt to locate shallower bedrock exposures.

Finally, where possible, the trenches were extended until areas of favourable alteration and/or mineralization passed into either fresh rock or at least areas of less altered non-mineralized rock. By doing this, a sufficient profile is established to provide geochemical contrasts and control in the mapping of the lithological units.

Table 1: Summary of 2004-2005 Antares Trenches.

Trench
Zone
Length
(m)
 
 
Sampled
(m)
Not Sampled (m)
Samples
Mapped
T_23
Discovery
206
206
0
101
yes
T_24
Central
662
428
234
204
no
T_25
# 7
252
193
59
101
no
T_26
Central
286
118
168
56
yes
T_27
Sophia North
173
127
46
61
no
T_28
Sophia
535
535
0
273
yes
T_29
Discovery
191
191
0
86
no
T_30
Sophia
161
126
35
64
yes
T_31
Sophia
167
167
0
85
yes
T_32
Sophia
230
193
37
99
no
T_33
North
233
233
0
121
yes
T_34
North
179
0
179
0
no
T_35
Sophia
67
31
36
13
no
T_10 ext.
Discovery
202
39
163
20
no
 
Total
3544
2587
957
1284
 

Antares Trench Mapping

None of the previous 22 trenches completed by Teck appear to have been mapped in detail. As a result, a program of 1:500 scale trench mapping was initiated in 2004 using a consulting geologist, Daniel Bonafede from Salta Argentina, and a group of field assistants to help in cleaning the trenches and also measuring the advance of the mapping. Several of the original 22 Teck trenches were identified as being priorities for detailed geological mapping and 9 of these were completed in late 2004 by Daniel Bonafede.

In early 2005, a second phase of detailed, 1:500 scale trench mapping was envisaged for the 14 new trenches completed by Antares. Unfortunately, the onset of early cold weather and snow allowed for the completion of only 6 of the 14 trenches.

Both phases of trench mapping utilized the same mapping conventions, rock units, and coding systems as those used during the surface bedrock mapping program. To facilitate the integration of the trench mapping data with the drill-hole data; all trench data was converted into a “log format” similar to the logs used to record drill-hole information. Thus, each trench could be used as a “sub horizontal drill hole” for the purposes of plotting cross sections, etc.

Antares Trench Results

The principal result of the new trenching campaign has been the delineation of the new Sofia oxide-copper mineralized zone with trenches T-28, T-30, and T-31 (Figure 1). Additional trenches, T-32 and T-35, established the continuity of this new mineralization, and the connection with mineralization of the Discovery Zone (Figure 1).  Anomalous geochemical results from trenches to the NW of the Sofia Zone, T-27 and T-33, suggest that the mineralized zone may continue under the talus cover to the south of those trenches.

New trenching in the area of the Discovery Zone, T-23 and T-10 extension (Figure 1), has established the eastern limit of that mineralization. New trenching has also shown that the Discovery Zone mineralization remains open to the south and west where it disappears under rock talus cover; and as mentioned earlier, contiguous with the Sofia Zone to the north-northwest.

New trenches in the central area of the property, T-24, T-26, and T-29 (Figure 1), provide a good profile of geology, alteration, and geochemistry across the central portion of the Rio Grande system. The SW most portion of T-24 (Figure 1) encountered anomalous copper in bedrock, before it passed into thick rock talus cover. This may be the south-western extension to the Discovery Zone mineralization. Similar geochemical anomalies were encountered in the SW most part of T-25 (Figure1), before it too encountered thick rock talus cover.

In conclusion, trenching has proved to be positive, fast, cost effective method for testing soil geochemistry anomalies, delineating and extending known zones of mineralization, and for geological investigations in areas of talus cover or limited outcrop. Table 2 presents the geochemical results from the 2004-2005 Antares trenching program.

Table 2: Summary of the principal mineralized intervals cut by the 2004-2005 Antares trenches.

Trench
Zone
Interval (m)
Length (m)
Cu %
Au g/t
Ag g/t
T-23
Discovery
0-108
108
0.33
0.42
3.20
 
incl. 64-100
36
0.54
0.65
4.00
T-24
Central
182-232
50
0.12
0.25
0.50
incl. 202-212
10
0.32
0.39
0.50
T-25
# 7
154-200
46
0.15
0.10
0.80
incl. 192-200
8
0.20
0.28
1.30
T-26
Central
52-62
10
0.11
0.33
0.80
T-27
Sophia North
76-80
4
0.16
0.70
26.80
110-116
6
0.35
1.24
13.40
incl. 112-114
2
0.80
3.34
31.40
T-28
Sophia
10-22
12
0.28
0.16
1.50
76-184
108
0.57
0.92
3.80
incl. 76-136
60
0.82
0.66
3.10
incl. 86-130
44
0.95
0.79
3.70
incl. 156-184
28
0.30
2.00
7.20
incl. 168-182
14
0.20
3.41
10.70
T-29
Central
erratic anomalous values, no significant results
T-30
Sophia
20-46
26
0.26
0.08
0.40
64-90
26
0.30
0.22
1.60
T-31
Sophia
0-86
86
0.39
0.41
1.60
incl. 0-56
56
0.49
0.55
2.00
incl. 0-36
36
0.64
0.70
2.50
incl. 74-86
12
0.38
0.35
1.40
T-32
Sophia
10-66
56
0.21
0.07
0.68
82-144
62
0.35
0.37
2.12
incl. 112-136
24
0.49
0.52
1.95
T-33
North
104-124
20
0.32
0.43
2.68
T-34
North
not sampled
T-35
Sophia
0-26
26
0.19
0.16
0.97
T-10-EXT
Discovery
8-40
32
0.10
0.15
1.10

 

Previous Teck-Mansfield 2000-2001 Trenching Work

Previous trenching work at the Rio Grande project by Mansfield and Teck proved to be highly effective exploration technique. Within the area of mineralization there is only 10 to 15 percent outcrop: however, the surrounding colluvium cover is often less than 2 meters thick. Trenches were typically, 0.5 to 1.0 meters deep, with channel samples collected in areas where bedrock is exposed.

During 2000-2001, Teck constructed 22 trenches totalling approximately 2,650 metres (Figure 1). A total of 1,399 rock chip samples for Au, Ag, and Cu geochemical analyses were collected from these trenches. Trenches one (1) through five (5) were hand-dug; while all the others were completed using an excavator. Trenches were sampled in 2-meter intervals (4-meters in a few poorly exposed areas) by a portable diamond saw and hand channel sampling using a chisel and mallet. At the start of the program, all samples were analyzed for 32-elements using ICP and gold by fire assay; however in an apparent cost-cutting measure, the bulk of the remaining trenches were only sampled and analyzed for copper and silver by standard geochemical techniques, and gold by fire assay (Table 3).

Trench locations were surveyed using a Trimble differential GPS unit, while test pit locations were surveyed by using a Garmin 12XL GPS unit. Trench locations are shown schematically in Figure 150. Antares has subsequently found that the “surveyed” locations of these trenches does not match very well with their positions on recently acquired, high-resolution (i.e., 0.6 metre pixel size) Quick Bird images.

Table 3: Teck 2000-2001 trenching program highlights.

Trench No
Length (m)
Cu (ppm)
 
 
Au (ppb)
Ag (ppm)
Au (ppb)/ Cu (ppm)
1W
20
3,646
468
5.2
0.128
1
97
5,736
969
8.7
0.169
1E
10
3,854
367
8.4
0.095
2
30
7,401
1,185
9.1
0.160
3
19
3,135
223
3.5
0.071
4
48
4,318
739
6.6
0.171
4X
18
4,797
496
4.7
0.103
5
44
3,654
447
6.3
0.122
5M
36
4,996
919
9.2
0.184
6
22
2,741
128
NS
0.047
7
28
2,913
150
NS
0.051
8
26
3,457
195
NS
0.056
8X
36
2,728
200
NS
0.073
9
86
2,114
171
NS
0.081
10
28
2,220
473
2.6
0.213
11
56
2,783
229
3
0.082
11X
12
4,876
434
3.95
0.089
12S
10
4,410
277
3.2
0.063
12C
28
3,881
361
4.1
0.093
12N
8
3,488
407
4.5
0.117
13
26
4,990
390
6.3
0.078
14
6
3,103
204
2.7
0.066
15
12
3,337
393
3.8
0.118
16
112
1,321
96
1.3
0.073
17
12
1,963
70
2.2
0.036
18
 
NS
NS
NS
 
19
 
NS
NS
NS
 
20
42
4,303
267
2
0.062
20
150
2,667
115
NS
0.043
21
10
3,400
341
2.6
0.100
22
18
4,854
680
4.4
0.140
TP1
6
4,132
273
3
0.066
TP2
 
NS
NS
NS
 
TP3
 
NS
NS
NS
 
TP4
 
NS
NS
NS
 
TP5
 
NS
NS
NS
 

 

 

Copyright 2007 by Antares Minerals Inc.